From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Many overlook the possibility sin(x,360.0) ?
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:35:16 +0200
Date: 2017-05-02T10:35:16+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oe9gc6$20o$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3e8fb7a2-e218-4b0e-8a20-174162392093@googlegroups.com
On 02/05/2017 08:37, reinert wrote:
> My point is that "x" and "period" has the same dimmension in sin(x,period).
Yes
> "x" (and "Period") may not represent radians or degree. "x" may
> represent for example time (seconds) or meters - or lightyears :-)
x/period must be dimensionless, which is satisfied when both have same
dimension.
> In
> some way "radians" and "degree" are "dimmensionless" varaiables (do not
> miss-understand me here).
Yes, arguments of all non-algebraic functions must be dimensionless. So
sine goes.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-01 5:22 Many overlook the possibility sin(x,360.0) ? reinert
2017-05-01 8:50 ` hreba
2017-05-01 17:46 ` Nasser M. Abbasi
2017-05-01 20:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-05-01 20:46 ` Shark8
2017-05-02 6:37 ` reinert
2017-05-02 8:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2017-05-03 4:12 ` reinert
2017-05-03 7:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-05-08 17:37 ` reinert
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox