From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@acm.nospam.org>
Subject: Re: parent package referring to child
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:06:29 GMT
Date: 2007-10-10T17:06:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oE7Pi.126815$Xa3.58956@attbi_s22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1191997397.865251.322480@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
eliben wrote:
>
> I have a package FOO that encapsulates a large part of the system. Now
> I need to add to it a public type (that should be visible by external
> code) with a lot of enumerated names (hundreds). I don't want to fill
> the spec of FOO with this huge type, so I thought it would be a good
> idea to create a subpackage: FOO.Names, and place the type there.
FOO seems the logical place to declare the type. Its size seems immaterial.
--
Jeff Carter
"We use a large, vibrating egg."
Annie Hall
44
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-10 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-10 6:23 parent package referring to child eliben
2007-10-10 9:07 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-10-10 9:24 ` eliben
2007-10-10 14:46 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-10-10 19:26 ` Simon Wright
2007-10-10 14:59 ` Matthew Heaney
2007-10-10 18:54 ` Vadim Godunko
2007-10-10 19:32 ` Matthew Heaney
2007-10-10 20:20 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-10-11 4:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-10-11 15:21 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-10-19 12:45 ` Vadim Godunko
2007-10-10 19:51 ` Matthew Heaney
2007-10-10 17:06 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2007-10-10 19:17 ` anon
2007-10-11 9:45 ` george
2007-10-12 4:15 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-10-12 9:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox