From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Why can't Ada use dot notation on private types?
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:27:13 +0100
Date: 2017-02-06T21:27:13+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <o7am71$13o1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: o7ajn5$it2$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk
On 2017-02-06 20:44, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> The problems mainly come from the possibility of implicit .all and 'Access.
Perfect, why is this a problem? It is just what is needed. I want to
override "all", so let me do this.
P.S. Ampersand notation must be definable just like dot notation is.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-06 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-05 14:17 Why can't Ada use dot notation on private types? Lucretia
2017-02-05 15:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-02-06 19:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-02-06 20:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2017-02-08 23:26 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-02-09 8:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-02-06 19:40 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox