comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Is Python higher level than Ada?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:36:47 +0200
Date: 2016-11-16T02:36:47+02:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <o0g9mu$m6p$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)

Is the following statement correct?

"Python is a higher level programming language than Ada."

The purpose of my question is not to start a holy war, but to get better 
understanding of what "higher level programming language" phrase may mean.

I have good knowledge of both Python and Ada.

My question is not about particular features, but about which features are 
considered in definition of "higher level".

One feature I may think of, is that Python may be more easily integrated 
with databases by using dynamic fields or attributes. Does this feature 
contribute to what deserves to be called "higher level"?

Also Python 3 has metaclasses but Ada doesn't. Is it essential for 
definition of a very high level programming language?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-16  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16  0:36 Victor Porton [this message]
2016-11-16  6:56 ` Is Python higher level than Ada? Paul Rubin
2016-11-16 13:01   ` G.B.
2016-11-16 13:46     ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-11-17  2:52       ` Randy Brukardt
2016-11-17  3:11         ` Paul Rubin
2016-11-16 16:08   ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-11-16 17:23     ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-11-16  9:12 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-11-16 15:23 ` Maciej Sobczak
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox