From: Coyo T Stormcaller <coyo@darkdna.net>
Subject: Re: Full view of limited extension?
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:06:28 -0500
Date: 2016-10-28T23:06:28-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nv176o$lcp$2@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: nur5ki$epv$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk
Randy Brukardt wrote:
>>This statement will not be popular on this group, but I have never had
>>similar problems with
>>C++ - and we are talking about language features that are already at least
>>one decade old.
>>Something went wrong somewhere.
>
> Yes, your illegal code. :-) It was someone's attempt to port your code to
> a different Ada compiler (one that properly diagnosed the illegality) that
> caused (a) the ACATS test to be created, and (b) GNAT to be fixed [in some
> order].
I am among giants.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-29 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 6:24 Full view of limited extension? Maciej Sobczak
2016-10-18 7:22 ` G.B.
2016-10-18 7:30 ` Vratislav Podzimek
2016-10-18 15:22 ` Tero Koskinen
2016-10-20 0:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-10-26 13:36 ` Maciej Sobczak
2016-10-26 21:02 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-10-26 21:08 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-10-27 7:56 ` Maciej Sobczak
2016-10-29 4:06 ` Coyo T Stormcaller [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox