From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Can anyone help with GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators ? (Possible memory corruption)
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:08:34 -0700
Date: 2016-09-08T12:08:34-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nqscvn$j2h$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08e0581a-30f1-4cc5-972c-2d6c539d9df6@googlegroups.com>
On 09/08/2016 11:03 AM, Anh Vo wrote:
> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 10:04:06 AM UTC-7, Simon Wright wrote:
>> Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Then, what would be the proper fix?
>>
>> To what? If you mean the apparent bug in GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators
>
> Yes.
Clearly it needs to have the assumption, that all Strings have a lower bound of
1, eliminated.
--
Jeff Carter
"English bed-wetting types."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
15
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-04 19:22 Can anyone help with GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators ? (Possible memory corruption) Natasha Kerensikova
2016-09-05 17:18 ` Stephen Leake
2016-09-06 19:24 ` Natasha Kerensikova
2016-09-06 19:52 ` Florian Weimer
2016-09-06 20:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-09-06 21:04 ` Simon Wright
2016-09-08 16:00 ` Anh Vo
2016-09-08 17:04 ` Simon Wright
2016-09-08 18:03 ` Anh Vo
2016-09-08 18:10 ` Simon Wright
2016-09-08 19:08 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2016-09-09 6:04 ` Natasha Kerensikova
2016-09-09 6:15 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-09-09 8:25 ` J-P. Rosen
2016-09-08 19:19 ` Florian Weimer
2016-09-06 19:44 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox