comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Which GNAT requires LAPACK and BLAS for Ada.Numerics.xxx?
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:12:22 -0400
Date: 2010-07-13T00:12:22-04:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nospam-22F7CF.00122113072010@news.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5cf5e149-a827-4890-a80b-6ee37109ddca@i19g2000pro.googlegroups.com

In article 
<5cf5e149-a827-4890-a80b-6ee37109ddca@i19g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
 Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net> wrote:

> The PLplot developers need a bit of help with automating their build 
> process with regard to Ada (GNAT only). They use cmake. As the person 
> who wrote the Ada binding, I've been asked to get the information.
> 
> Currently, cmake has an Ada 2005 flag which if set, with-s and use-s 
> Ada.Numerics.Long_Real_Arrays which was added in Ada 2005. If the 
> flag is not set, the binding source code is automatically modified a 
> little bit so that the 2005-specific stuff is not needed. (The 
> binding only needs the Vector and Matrix declarations, so this is a 
> lot of work for such a small benefit, but that's the way things are 
> right now.)
> 
> If Ada.Numerics.Long_Real_Arrays is used, it needs to link to lapack 
> and blas which the PLplot cmake process can be made to handle.
> 
> So the questions are:
> 
> (1) What is the earliest version of GNAT that requires lapack and blas
> if Ada.Numerics.Long_Real_Arrays is referenced? I think it might be
> 4.3.

Definitely in 4.3.4:

$ pwd
/usr/local/ada-4.3/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin9/4.3.4/adainclude
$ egrep -iH "with.*blas|with.*lapack" a-*.ad[sb]
a-ngcoar.adb:with System.Generic_Complex_BLAS;
a-ngcoar.adb:with System.Generic_Complex_LAPACK;
a-ngrear.adb:with System.Generic_Real_BLAS;
a-ngrear.adb:with System.Generic_Real_LAPACK;
 
> (2) Is there an earlier version that has the limited capabilities 
> required by the Ada binding, specifically, only the declarations for 
> type Real_Vector is array (Integer range <>) of Real'Base; type 
> Real_Matrix is array (Integer range <>, Integer range <>) but which 
> does not require linking lapack and blas?

I started with Martin Dowie's 296 & 346:

<http://www.martin.dowie.btinternet.co.uk/>

IIRC, the changes were minor. If it would help, I have the last, 
independent set that I used before switching to BLAS/LAPACK in June, 
20009.

<http://home.roadrunner.com/~jbmatthews/misc/groots.html>

-- 
John B. Matthews
trashgod at gmail dot com
<http://sites.google.com/site/drjohnbmatthews>



  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-13  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-13  2:34 Which GNAT requires LAPACK and BLAS for Ada.Numerics.xxx? Jerry
2010-07-13  4:12 ` John B. Matthews [this message]
2010-07-14 13:00   ` Ada novice
2010-07-15  7:46     ` Jerry
2010-07-15 11:16       ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-07-14 13:15 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-07-15  7:48 ` Jerry
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox