From: Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: MFC
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:04:06 +0100
Date: 2003-03-21T10:04:06+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nnkl7v8t2kvsc1n57sqi9kcmu4bprodr42@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1048176444.65357@master.nyc.kbcfp.com
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:07:23 -0500, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
wrote:
>Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> The only problem we faced, before abadoning any use of MFC in our C++
>> projects, was that it leaked in many places on many occasions. Is that
>> horrible enough? (:-))
>
>We've written largish C++ applications with MFC and they don't leak.
>Did you acquire any evidence that the leak was due to internal MFC
>behavior rather than your own failure to manage resources correctly?
I do not remember all details. One case was, that some MFC class
wrapper for a GUI object simply didn't free the resource in its
destructor. But this was long time ago, and since then it became
obvious (to us) that it is far more easier to develop Windows
applications using raw Windows API. And of course, another good reason
to push for Ada! (:-))
---
Regards,
Dmitry Kazakov
www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-21 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-19 22:11 MFC alpha
2003-03-20 8:52 ` MFC Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-20 14:40 ` MFC Frank J. Lhota
2003-03-20 16:07 ` MFC Hyman Rosen
2003-03-20 17:13 ` MFC Preben Randhol
2003-03-20 17:35 ` MFC Hyman Rosen
2003-03-21 9:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2003-03-21 1:48 ` MFC Jeffrey Carter
2003-03-21 3:29 ` MFC Steve
2003-03-21 15:57 ` MFC David Botton
2003-03-22 16:36 ` MFC alpha
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox