From: Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Passing the same actual as both in and out formal parameters?
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:13:25 +0100
Date: 2009-11-17T14:13:25+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nh7udh.3ue.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <044632e0-e40c-4c47-ab56-189f4ae0c15b@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Ludovic Brenta a �crit :
> My exampled was heavily simplified; the actual type has about a
> hundred components and the procedure P is a little more complex than
> swapping components :)
>
> But thanks for the responses, Niklas and Jean-Pierre. They confirm my
> suspicion.
>
But the important thing is that there is no risk: behaviour is well
defined, and will not change with the next release of the compiler.
If it is not the behaviour you want, you can make a local copy (but you
know that).
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 9:50 Passing the same actual as both in and out formal parameters? Ludovic Brenta
2009-11-17 10:31 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-11-17 11:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-11-17 13:13 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen [this message]
2009-11-17 16:07 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-11-18 10:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-11-17 10:40 ` Niklas Holsti
2009-11-17 16:26 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-11-17 21:25 ` Randy Brukardt
2009-11-18 0:11 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-11-18 0:23 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-11-18 3:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox