From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Non_Primitive Operations and Object.Operation Resolution
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 17:38:20 -0700
Date: 2016-04-22T17:38:20-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nfefvh$ldt$2@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552a43ba-5a15-4d46-bb74-7d144d3cd77c@googlegroups.com>
On 04/22/2016 04:49 PM, ytomino wrote:
> I think It's a bug of the compiler.
>
> I tried to move the prototype of Element from body to spec.
> Then, I got success to compile it with gcc-6.0.0-20160401.
That does seem indicative of a compiler error. Where the declaration appears
shouldn't make a difference.
--
Jeff Carter
"Go and boil your bottoms."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
01
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-23 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 23:59 Non_Primitive Operations and Object.Operation Resolution Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-21 20:28 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-04-21 21:13 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-22 6:27 ` AdaMagica
2016-04-22 18:24 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-22 22:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-04-23 0:37 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-22 23:49 ` ytomino
2016-04-23 0:38 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox