From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Subject: Re: timer_server triggers Task_Termination handler
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:05:50 +0200
Date: 2016-04-22T12:05:50+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nfcsri$1s3$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nfcjmm$1nei$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On 22.04.16 09:25, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Tracing hardware utilization is meaningless in the form you stated.
Specifically, allocate tasks to processors, also know
about which tasks are allocated to which processors,
in order to stay in control of what happens where,
and what has failed to happen there, in case it has.
Of course, that's denying the abstraction that an OS
might want to provide, but I think this is a reasonable
view in cases where Ada programs operate a system in
a predictable way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-22 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 10:23 timer_server triggers Task_Termination handler Per Dalgas Jakobsen
2016-04-21 18:14 ` Anh Vo
2016-04-21 18:20 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2016-04-21 18:31 ` Anh Vo
2016-04-21 21:13 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-04-22 5:41 ` J-P. Rosen
2016-04-22 6:46 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2016-04-21 21:26 ` Robert A Duff
2016-04-22 6:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
2016-04-22 7:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-04-22 10:05 ` G.B. [this message]
2016-04-22 12:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-04-22 13:33 ` G.B.
2016-04-22 13:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-04-22 22:31 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-04-23 9:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-04-25 21:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-04-22 22:35 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox