Using Functions of Executable

Using Functions of Executable

[Alexander Camek]

Hi all,

I have got an executable generated with gnatmake. And a lot of modules using 
some functions of the executable. Now all these modules are generated as 
libraries and used during run-time. Okay this works fine under Linux, but 
under Windows i got stucked.

My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my executable, 
although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with pragma 
Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).

What I have tried is to 
use -Wl,--export-dynamics,--out-implib,<Executable-name>.lib, but with this 
option i don't get any .lib file to link my Dll against. And if i use the 
opiton -Wl,--export-all-symbols every symbol even not from libraries my 
executable is linked against. I also combined the last option 
with -Wl,--exclude-libs,ALL but that doesn't help. Extend to that I now, 
that all works fine with .gpr files, there i only use the first linker 
option. But I don't want to use them anymore, to make the build more 
transparent.

Anybody an idea. I am really stucked.

Thanks to all.

Greetings

Alexander 

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Dirk Heinrichs]

Alexander Camek wrote:

> I have got an executable generated with gnatmake. And a lot of modules
> using some functions of the executable. Now all these modules are
> generated as libraries and used during run-time. Okay this works fine
> under Linux, but under Windows i got stucked.
>
> Anybody an idea. I am really stucked.

Separate those functions into a library, maybe?

HTH...

        Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs          | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: dirk.heinrichs@capgemini.com
Wanheimerstraße 68      | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40468 Düsseldorf      | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Frank Piron]

Am 22.11.2007, 10:18 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Camek  
<Alexander.Camek@Elektrobit.com>:

> My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my executable,
> although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with  
> pragma
> Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).

Try: Export(Stdcall, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>)

Frank Piron

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Alexander Camek]

Hi,

>> My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my executable,
>> although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with 
>> pragma
>> Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).
>
> Try: Export(Stdcall, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>)

Will that work under linux, too?
Because I need it platform independent.

Greetings

Alexander 

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Frank Piron]

  26.11.2007, 14:07 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Camek  
<Alexander.Camek@Elektrobit.com>:

> Hi,
>
>>> My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my executable,
>>> although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with
>>> pragma
>>> Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).
>>
>> Try: Export(Stdcall, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>)
>
> Will that work under linux, too?
> Because I need it platform independent.

No. Unfortunately creating shared libraries depends on the OS.

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Pascal Obry]

Frank Piron a ï¿œcrit :
>  26.11.2007, 14:07 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Camek
> <Alexander.Camek@Elektrobit.com>:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>>>> My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my executable,
>>>> although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with
>>>> pragma
>>>> Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).
>>>
>>> Try: Export(Stdcall, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>)
>>
>> Will that work under linux, too?
>> Because I need it platform independent.
> 
> No. Unfortunately creating shared libraries depends on the OS.

Yes it will, RTFM :) Stdcall will be translated as C convention on
GNU/Linux.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|              http://www.obry.net
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Alexander Camek]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 865 bytes --]


"Pascal Obry" <pascal@obry.net> wrote in message 
news:474C4FCF.70202@obry.net...
> Frank Piron a �crit :
>>  26.11.2007, 14:07 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Camek
>> <Alexander.Camek@Elektrobit.com>:
>>>>> My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my 
>>>>> executable,
>>>>> although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with
>>>>> pragma
>>>>> Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).
>>>>
>>>> Try: Export(Stdcall, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>)
>>>
>>> Will that work under linux, too?
>>> Because I need it platform independent.
>>
>> No. Unfortunately creating shared libraries depends on the OS.
>
> Yes it will, RTFM :) Stdcall will be translated as C convention on
> GNU/Linux.

Thanks.
Seems that I have missed to read that little note at the end of that 
chapter.

But this doesn't fix my initial problem.

Greetings

Alexander 

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Martin Krischik]

Pascal Obry schrieb:
> Frank Piron a écrit :
>>  26.11.2007, 14:07 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Camek
>> <Alexander.Camek@Elektrobit.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>> My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my executable,
>>>>> although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with
>>>>> pragma
>>>>> Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).
>>>> Try: Export(Stdcall, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>)
>>> Will that work under linux, too?
>>> Because I need it platform independent.
>> No. Unfortunately creating shared libraries depends on the OS.
> 
> Yes it will, RTFM :) Stdcall will be translated as C convention on
> GNU/Linux.

And No: not all targets support the creation of DLL's.

Martin

-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Pascal Obry]

Martin Krischik a écrit :

> And No: not all targets support the creation of DLL's.

The question was about Windows Stdcall on GNU/Linux. So I repeat yes it
will work.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|              http://www.obry.net
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Stephen Leake]

"Alexander Camek" <Alexander.Camek@Elektrobit.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
>>> My Problem is that I can't export the functions given in my executable,
>>> although all exported functions in the executable are decorated with 
>>> pragma
>>> Export(C, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>).
>>
>> Try: Export(Stdcall, <Funktion>, <Symbolname>)
>
> Will that work under linux, too?
> Because I need it platform independent.

The conventions supported by export are defined by the compiler.

So you need to read the user's guide for the compiler you will be
using on all of the platforms you need to support.

It is likely that the conventions will differ, in which case you need
to use a tool similar to gnatprep to choose the convention for the
target compiler.

-- 
-- Stephe

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Alexander Camek]

Okay, after some further investigation, I have found out that the linker, 
especially gnatlink is getting too much information.

I saw that in calling gnatlink, which invokes gnat1 -- the front-end --, 
there are too much object files.
How can I avoid this.

former call:
gnatmake -P foo.gpr

now i want to do this:

gnatmake foo.adb

In foo.gpr I have got a 'with' to point to source files of a library bar.
Now from this library this object files are linked to my executable.

Is there a switch for gnatmake?
Or what is gnatmake doing when it is invoked with project files in diference 
to a normal invokation?

Thanks for any help

Greetings

Alexander 

Re: Using Functions of Executable

[Alexander Camek]

Hi Group,

The initial problem was that when I call gnatmake with only my 
main_programm.adb then there too much exported symbols in my .lib.
These symbols wasn't only symbols from my own libraries, the .lib file also 
contained a lot of system libraries symbols given by gnat or gnarl.

After some deeper search I got rid of the most symbols.

The problem occured during the bind step, which doesn't occure by gpr file 
usage. But this is only a guess.
It seems that the gnatbinder is using not only the system specific files for 
checking. So that the linker is forced to link all that files in my 
executable.
Then I played a little bit with the used switches.

This means I call gnatmake not with -I for system or dll dirs, instead I 
use -A switch in combination with -nostdlib.

Thanks everybody for your help and your hints.

If I have missed something or forgotten, please tell me.

Greetings

Alexander