From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Subject: Re: Looking for better Ada books
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:23:10 +0100
Date: 2016-03-12T11:23:10+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nc0qgk$rb0$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e0031d4-119f-49f4-a1ba-903178cf83fb@googlegroups.com>
On 12.03.16 08:10, Hadrien Grasland wrote:
> Online material tends to fall either in the "quick tutorial" or the "newcomer-hostile authoritative reference" category, with little in-between for the intermediate learners.
Also, some online material appears to have "holes": IINM,
the wikibook lacks a section specifically addressing visibility.
For example,
- what it is, basically,
- how it facilitates the organization of an Ada software source text,
- what size of grains there are, so to speak,
- ...
The book should have that, at least to an extent that gets the
user going.
--
"HOTDOGS ARE NOT BOOKMARKS"
Springfield Elementary teaching staff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-12 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-10 15:00 Looking for better Ada books MRV@gmail.com
2016-03-10 16:59 ` Anh Vo
2016-03-10 21:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-03-11 14:29 ` G.B.
2016-03-12 2:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-03-12 7:10 ` Hadrien Grasland
2016-03-12 10:23 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2016-03-12 18:13 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-03-12 18:13 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-03-14 23:23 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-03-13 2:42 ` mvinn@gmail.com
2016-03-14 23:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-03-15 10:50 ` Bob Butler
2016-03-13 13:30 ` gautier_niouzes
2016-03-10 17:35 ` Olivier Henley
2016-03-11 2:44 ` mvinn@gmail.com
2016-03-14 15:11 ` Olivier Henley
2016-03-11 14:05 ` Brian Drummond
2016-03-14 13:46 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-03-14 15:05 ` Olivier Henley
2016-03-14 17:57 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox