From: "chris.danx" <chris.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Thoughts and Opinions or something like that
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:51:29 +0100
Date: 2001-04-25T11:51:29+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n_xF6.401$vJ5.98328@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3AE69665.63E362CD@info.unicaen.fr
Hi, [posting to others re-instated]
> > Things I'd like from a VM (off the top of my head - I don't use VMs
> > directly and I have no idea whether the following are possible):
> >
> > - garbage collection
> > - support for coroutines (no single stack restrictions)
> > - support for tail recursion
> >
> > (the last two are known problems with the JVM, I believe).
>
>
> Scheme VMs have GC and tail-call optimization. Java VM has threads.
> Icon VM has coroutines (rather: co-expressions). No problems, and
> I would add that it is MUCH easier to provide for a more complicated
> semantics of a language using an interpreter than compiling to
> a native code...
Do you mean just rip out an interpreter and forget the VM idea until later?
That sounds like a good idea.
>
> > If you want to concentrate on your language, rather than writing the VM,
> > you could target an existing machine - apart from the obvious .net and
> > JVM, you might consider C--
>
>
> Sorry, but I am violently against this approach, if you want to do
> something interesting, to learn new paradigms, to have some fun. Using
> existing VPlatforms (BTW, C-- is not one) is good for the portability
> and for the possibility of "selling" it to a wider community, but it
> is a little boring, and you feel like putting yourself voluntarily
> into a somebody else's straitjacket.
>
> ...
>
> "chris danx":
> > and the following "not sure" or "in many paradigms" features
> >
> > - Units bound to values/variables
> > - Lists []
> > - Arrays <>
>
> Don't neglect reasonable arrays, please, otherwise one day, sooner
> or later you will regret it...
>
What do you mean by reasonable arrays? What's unreasonable about them?
Chris
>
> Jerzy Karczmarczuk
> Caen, France
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-25 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-24 17:12 Thoughts and Opinions or something like that chris.danx
2001-04-24 21:35 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-24 23:27 ` chris.danx
2001-04-25 7:40 ` Andrew Cooke
2001-04-25 10:42 ` chris.danx
2001-04-25 17:26 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2001-04-26 14:22 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
[not found] ` <3AE69665.63E362CD@info.unicaen.fr>
2001-04-25 10:51 ` chris.danx [this message]
2001-04-25 13:51 ` Jerzy Karczmarczuk
2001-04-25 13:52 ` chris.danx
[not found] ` <3AE6DAB3.899FF645@andrewcooke.free-online.co.uk>
2001-04-25 14:30 ` chris.danx
[not found] ` <3AE7E37B.F384DCDA@info.unicaen.fr>
2001-04-26 9:02 ` Play with virtual machines (Was: Thoughts and Opinions...) chris.danx
[not found] ` <3AE81234.267643AC@kfunigraz.ac.at>
2001-04-26 12:57 ` chris.danx
2001-04-27 2:14 ` Larry Elmore
2001-04-27 3:27 ` Goldhammer
2001-05-03 17:00 ` singlespeeder
2001-05-03 17:03 ` singlespeeder
2001-04-25 9:06 ` Thoughts and Opinions or something like that Tarjei T. Jensen
2001-04-25 12:12 ` Jeffrey M. Vinocur
2001-04-26 2:12 ` Nicholas James NETHERCOTE
2001-04-26 18:23 ` Keith Thompson
2001-04-25 12:09 ` Alain Fischer
2001-04-27 18:20 ` brian hiles
2001-04-28 1:27 ` Gregory Toomey
2001-04-28 21:34 ` chris.danx
2001-04-28 21:34 ` chris.danx
2001-04-30 8:31 ` Jon Beniston
2001-05-04 8:49 ` Biep @ http://www.biep.org
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox