From: "DuckE" <nospam_steved94@home.com>
Subject: Re: Question on using protected objects
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 19:01:39 GMT
Date: 2001-09-29T19:01:39+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nUot7.54125$QK.36060114@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3BB604E6.684884D9@avercom.net
"Tucker Taft" <stt@avercom.net> wrote in message
news:3BB604E6.684884D9@avercom.net...
>
[snip]
> I presume you might be wondering whether you can
> use the entry family index in an entry barrier. The
> answer is definitely. An entry family is like an array
> of entries, and each has its own entry queue, and may
> hence have an entry barrier expression that differs
> according to the entry family index.
Yes, that is EXACTLY what I was wondering. Thank you for clearing that up
for me.
SteveD
>
> Normal entries are not allowed to reference their "normal"
> parameters in the entry barrier expression because there is
> only one entry queue, and the entry barrier applies to the
> queue as a whole, not individual calls on the entry.
> The parameters of course depend on individual calls.
>
> -Tucker Taft stt@avercom.net
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-29 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-29 3:45 Question on using protected objects DuckE
2001-09-29 6:16 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-29 12:30 ` DuckE
2001-09-29 14:20 ` Jeff Creem
2001-09-29 15:09 ` DuckE
2001-09-29 17:24 ` Ehud Lamm
2001-09-29 17:29 ` Tucker Taft
2001-09-29 19:01 ` DuckE [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox