From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: GNAT and user-defined aspects and pragmas?
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:51:42 +0100
Date: 2015-11-13T09:51:42+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n2486m$9j7$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <n22p65$67h$1@loke.gir.dk>
Le 12/11/2015 20:27, Randy Brukardt a écrit :
> But since those are pragmas (and many other implementation-defined things
> like them), the notion that unknown pragmas can be ignored is fantasy.
Well, actually only /implementation defined/ pragmas can be ignored.
Language defined pragmas must be recognized, and are actually tested for
(as you probably know ;-) )
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-13 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 13:28 GNAT and user-defined aspects and pragmas? Jacob Sparre Andersen
2015-11-10 19:53 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2015-11-11 9:29 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2015-11-12 19:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-11-12 20:37 ` Shark8
2015-11-12 21:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-11-13 10:03 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-11-11 11:14 ` Simon Wright
2015-11-12 19:27 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-11-13 8:51 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox