From: cts@kampong.aedinc.net ((null))
Subject: Re: Diana specification for Ada
Date: 2000/08/25
Date: 2000-08-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mxBp5.2685$_X.11095@newsfeed.slurp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 39A697EA.C550BB83@excite.com
In article <39A697EA.C550BB83@excite.com>,
Dragonboy <dragonboy42@excite.com> wrote:
>Why don't most vendors use it? I was under the impression that it was an
>extremely powerfull IR. Is it too cumbersome?
I can't really help you out much if you want to use DIANA as the
internal representation for your own compiler, but if you just want
to write programs that access a compiler's internal representation
for a given Ada program you should take a look at ASIS, Ada Semantic
Interface Specification.
You can find it at
http://www.asset.com/stars/lm-tds/Papers/asis/asis.html
http://www.acm.org/sigada/WG/ASISWG/
--
=======================================================================
Life is short. | Craig Spannring
Bike hard, ski fast. | cts@internetcds.com
--------------------------------+------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-24 0:00 Diana specification for Ada Dragonboy
2000-08-24 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-08-25 0:00 ` Dragonboy
2000-08-25 0:00 ` (null) [this message]
2000-08-29 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-09-02 20:15 ` Mark T
2000-09-02 21:03 ` Robert Dewar
2000-09-03 18:27 ` Mark T
2000-08-25 0:00 ` Geg Bek
2000-09-06 8:33 ` Antonio Dur�n Dom�nguez
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox