From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: was Ada 83 in fact object oriented ?
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:30:29 +0200
Date: 2015-09-25T10:30:29+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mu30jh$7jf$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fjezw20zdnae.n6xeuqlpxfh$.dlg@40tude.net>
Le 25/09/2015 10:11, Dmitry A. Kazakov a écrit :
> Regarding extension, it is just one implementation of inheritance chosen
> for its simplicity. It has issues, lots of, e.g. with substitutability,
> multiple inheritance etc. A class can be built by many ways, extension is
> only one of them.
Yes, but my point (and I know you -and many others- disagree with that!)
is that inheritance is NOT required for OO. It is just one among many
ways of organizing objects.
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 22:23 was Ada 83 in fact object oriented ? halfmaddad
2015-09-24 23:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-09-25 2:30 ` halfmaddad
2015-09-25 8:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 8:30 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2015-09-25 8:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 8:03 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 8:14 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-09-25 8:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 11:04 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-09-25 12:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 12:44 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-09-25 15:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 12:44 ` halfmaddad
2015-09-25 16:24 ` Pascal Obry
2015-09-25 20:32 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-10-05 12:27 ` vincent.diemunsch
2015-10-01 13:46 ` Paul Colin de Gloucester
2015-10-05 12:12 ` Vincent
2015-10-05 18:28 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox