From: Wes Groleau <groleau@freeshell.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Bad addresses
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:49:17 -0500
Date: 2003-09-25T19:49:17-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mtucnTtpNKCREO6iXTWJjw@gbronline.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2003.09.25.20.52.43.460929@henrik-motakef.de>
Henrik Motakef wrote:
> While we are talking about being smart: I guess that Robust Design, LLC
> (Seattle) will be really thrilled by you burning their addresses at
> no.such.net (which happens to resolve to 216.57.210.200) by posting them
Bummer. Mea culpa. And I should have known better, too,
since three years ago I was getting spam forged as nowhere.com
and I looked it up to find that it did exist.
On the other hand, if they actually have a userID of
"not.real" on that host, they must WANT to get stuff.
--
Wes Groleau
Is it an on-line compliment to call someone a Net Wit ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-26 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-24 22:31 Current "Swen" worm attack - the best address Alexander Kopilovitch
2003-09-25 8:19 ` Preben Randhol
2003-09-25 15:48 ` Wes Groleau
2003-09-25 20:52 ` [OT] Bad addresses (was: Current "Swen" worm attack - the best address) Henrik Motakef
2003-09-26 0:49 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
2003-09-25 16:43 ` Current "Swen" worm attack - the best address Alexander Kopilovitch
2003-09-25 19:38 ` Preben Randhol
2003-09-26 3:16 ` Alexander Kopilovitch
2003-09-26 9:00 ` Preben Randhol
2003-09-26 17:20 ` Alexander Kopilovitch
2003-09-26 23:21 ` Wes Groleau
2003-09-27 13:45 ` Alexander Kopilovitch
2003-09-28 2:30 ` Wes Groleau
2003-09-28 17:52 ` Alexander Kopilovitch
2003-09-28 2:32 ` [off-topic] open letter to ISP admins--and virus program vendors Wes Groleau
2003-09-28 3:18 ` Wes Groleau
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox