From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Subject: Re: pragma/aspect Import, Convention parameters
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:24:22 +0200
Date: 2015-08-13T12:24:22+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mqhr5i$tco$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215a889y9uxf$.1nolkb1ctch79$.dlg@40tude.net>
On 13.08.15 10:27, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> But the convention is not an expression.
Maybe reflecting the approaches taken by a compiler
(code generation) vs that of the component that handles
names and locations of external routines (later)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-13 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 8:27 pragma/aspect Import, Convention parameters Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-08-13 10:24 ` G.B. [this message]
2015-08-13 11:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-08-13 20:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-08-14 7:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-08-14 20:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-08-15 1:15 ` Shark8
2015-08-17 21:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-08-17 21:47 ` Bob Duff
2015-08-20 16:00 ` Shark8
2015-08-13 23:42 ` David Botton
2015-08-15 5:22 ` gautier_niouzes
2015-08-17 21:54 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-08-20 16:07 ` Shark8
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox