From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: Representation clauses and records
Date: 1997/11/21
Date: 1997-11-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680002111971953070001@news.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3475F02C.5585B1B6@aonix.com
>Brian Orpin wrote:
>
>> I have played with this before but never fully understood it. Now I need
>> to understand it and my colleagues and I have had many hours discussing
>> it. The compiler being used is Ada 83.
>>
>> The question is simple; when declaring a representation clause for a
>> record there is an optional alignment clause using 'mod at'.
FYI (I know you said you're using Ada 83):
Just to let you know: the mod clause you refer to is an obselescent feature
of the language (see RM95 J.8). It was replaced by an "alignment clause."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-11-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <347000b1.4909762@news.geccs.gecm.com>
1997-11-21 0:00 ` Representation clauses and records Brian Nettleton
1997-11-21 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1997-11-21 0:00 ` Brian Nettleton
1997-11-24 0:00 ` Martin M Dowie
1997-11-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-11-27 0:00 ` Martin M Dowie
[not found] ` <347a8dc3.3438484@news.geccs.gecm.com>
1997-11-25 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-12-16 0:00 ` Pascal MALAISE
1997-12-16 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1997-12-17 0:00 ` Pascal MALAISE
1997-12-18 0:00 ` David J. Fiander
1997-12-18 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-12-18 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox