From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: Beware: Rep spec on an enumeration type causes code explosion
Date: 1997/12/09
Date: 1997-12-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680000912972016360001@news.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EKxx9n.Ly1.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com
In article <EKxx9n.Ly1.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) wrote:
>So in retrospect, I believe enumeration representation
>clauses in Ada are a mistake. If a user wants to name
>particular values, they should simply use named integer
>constants, or perhaps better, named private-type constants. They can build
>up various maps of their own if they want to translate to/from some kind
>of "holey" representation from/to a contiguous representation.
Hallelujah! I've always thought the same thing. If you want to read data
off an external interface, then just read it into an integer, and convert
it to an enumeration value yourself. Look Ma, no validity problems! And
no hidden inefficiencies. And no compiler complexity. And so on...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-12-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-12-05 0:00 Beware: Rep spec on an enumeration type causes code explosion Joe Gwinn
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Kevin D. Heatwole
[not found] ` <dewar.881478386@merv>
1997-12-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-09 0:00 ` Jim Gleason
1997-12-06 0:00 ` David Marshall
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-08 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-08 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1997-12-09 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-12-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Charles Hixson
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
1997-12-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1997-12-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-12-11 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-12-11 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-12-16 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-12-17 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-16 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-12-17 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-12-17 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-17 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-12-18 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Alan E & Carmel J Brain
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-15 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-12-16 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1997-12-11 0:00 ` Rakesh Malhotra
1997-12-11 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Rakesh Malhotra
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-14 0:00 ` Alan E & Carmel J Brain
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-16 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-09 0:00 ` Geert Bosch
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-12-10 0:00 ` GNORT information ( Was Re: Beware: Rep spec on an enumeration type causes code explosion ) Mark Bennison
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Beware: Rep spec on an enumeration type causes code explosion Robert Dewar
1997-12-08 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-08 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-09 0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1997-12-08 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-12-06 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-12-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-12-09 0:00 tmoran
1997-12-11 0:00 Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96
1997-12-11 0:00 Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96
1997-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox