From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: Not intended for use in medical devices
Date: 1997/05/08
Date: 1997-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680000805970900450001@news.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.863006367@merv
In article <dewar.863006367@merv>, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:
>As for (2), I don't see that. Indeed memory mapped I/O devices are tricky.
>Ada programmers in particular are tempted to speak to memory mapped I/O
>devices by using address clauses, and this almost always results in subtly
>non-portable code that is making unjustified assumptions.
Is there some _other_ way of doing memory I/O - without using address
clauses? Isn't memory-mapped I/O in fact the _reason_ for address clauses
in the language?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-05-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-05-04 0:00 Not intended for use in medical devices Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
1997-05-05 0:00 ` Kaz Kylheku
1997-05-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-05-06 0:00 ` Kaz Kylheku
1997-05-12 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-05-06 0:00 ` Michael F Brenner
1997-05-06 0:00 ` Kaz Kylheku
1997-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-05-08 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1997-05-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-05-14 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-05-03 0:00 Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
1997-05-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox