From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: Difference between Ada and Small talk - Object Oriented
Date: 1997/11/01
Date: 1997-11-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680000111971416580001@news.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 34592A6B.665@ednet.co.uk
In article <34592A6B.665@ednet.co.uk>, David Brown <davidbrown@ednet.co.uk>
wrote:
>Can any one help me, I have to write an essay on the differences between
>Ada and Smalltalk focusing on there object oriented features.
I'm not a SmallTalk programmer, but I do know Ada 95. Here's a couple
things to read:
o the section of the Ada 95 Rationale about the tagged types - you'll get
lots of insight into the model.
o the paper (go to the AdaIC or to the Ada Home) comparing Ada 95 to C++.
Let me know if you need more info.
Matt
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-11-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-10-30 0:00 Difference between Ada and Small talk - Object Oriented David Brown
1997-10-30 0:00 ` Al Christians
1997-11-02 0:00 ` James O'Connor
1997-11-01 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1997-11-02 0:00 ` James O'Connor
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox