From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Ravenscar vs selective wait
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:16:58 -0700
Date: 2015-03-24T10:16:58-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mes64o$10r$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mera8n$d4t$1@dont-email.me>
On 03/24/2015 02:21 AM, J-P. Rosen wrote:
>
> Some hint however: I have a record containing a PO similar to what Jeff
> suggests, and a Timing_Event that unblocks the PO when the delay has
> expired. Similarly, the Wait entry has an out parameter to tell whether
> it's been awaken by an event or by time-out.
I hadn't considered a timing event, thinking they were excluded. Now I see that
only local timing events are prohibited. A timing event would be better than a
task that polls.
--
Jeff Carter
"I've seen projects fail miserably for blindly
applying the Agile catechism: we're Agile, we
don't need to stop and think, we just go ahead
and code!"
Bertrand Meyer
150
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 22:00 Ravenscar vs selective wait Simon Wright
2015-03-24 6:48 ` Simon Wright
2015-03-24 7:25 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-03-24 9:21 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-03-24 17:16 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2015-03-24 20:12 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox