From: "Steve" <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 18:36:42 -0800
Date: 2005-11-03T18:36:42-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <meKdnXXIJd6tVPfeRVn-vw@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrndmloee.kq0.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org
"Anonymous Coward" <bogus_addy@bogus_domain.net> wrote in message
news:slrndmloee.kq0.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org...
> I'm interested in finding out what the default representation of a
> record type is. Can I expect the sequence of elements in the default
> representation to match the sequence they are defined in?
>
> Pointers to where this information can be found would also be
> appreciated, as Cohen's book and Google fail to answer this.
>
Look in the Ada 95 LRM section 13, Representation Issues
Section 13.1 paragraph 19
If an aspect of representation of an entity is not specified, it is chosen
by default in an unspecified manner.
So... if it matters, use a representation clause.
Steve
(The Duck)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-04 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-04 2:21 Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Anonymous Coward
2005-11-04 2:36 ` Steve [this message]
2005-11-04 4:11 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-04 5:30 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-05 3:13 ` Steve
2005-11-05 4:45 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-06 14:05 ` Steve
2005-11-06 16:08 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-07 7:25 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-08 13:36 ` Steve
2005-11-14 1:12 ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-14 3:03 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-14 18:08 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-14 18:49 ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-15 1:16 ` ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily? Anonymous Coward
2005-11-15 2:10 ` tmoran
2005-11-15 3:12 ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-15 6:44 ` Simon Wright
2005-11-16 0:16 ` Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?) Björn Persson
2005-11-16 5:38 ` Adaists Deny Acronym Simon Wright
2005-11-16 6:16 ` Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?) Samuel Tardieu
2005-11-15 12:43 ` ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily? Jeff Creem
2005-11-14 21:14 ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Simon Wright
2005-11-04 13:26 ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 14:33 ` Marc A. Criley
2005-11-04 18:35 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-11-04 20:07 ` Britt Snodgrass
2005-11-04 14:39 ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 15:27 ` Britt Snodgrass
2005-11-04 15:55 ` Lauri Ora
2005-11-04 21:42 ` Larry Kilgallen
2005-11-05 2:26 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 2:42 ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-05 3:27 ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05 3:55 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 4:07 ` Lauri Ora
2005-11-05 13:46 ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05 10:14 ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 16:52 ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-04 16:57 ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-04 23:27 ` tmoran
2005-11-05 10:25 ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-14 1:09 ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-05 3:33 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 10:34 ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-05 16:35 ` ADA/C interfaces: type representations uncontrollable in C Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 16:49 ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05 18:24 ` tmoran
2005-11-09 2:12 ` 'Size can mean value size OR object size, depending Anonymous Coward
2005-11-09 3:27 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-09 4:04 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 14:27 ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Michael Bode
2005-11-05 16:17 ` pragma convention Anonymous Coward
2005-11-06 1:07 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-06 22:22 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-07 7:34 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-05 14:39 ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Martin Krischik
2005-11-04 9:40 ` Martin Dowie
2005-11-04 14:36 ` Marc A. Criley
2005-11-04 17:45 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox