From: "Björn Lundin" <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is Ada 83 still deployed anywhere?
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 13:10:21 +0100
Date: 2015-03-01T13:10:21+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mcuvi2$q5h$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mcupjl$g1d$1@speranza.aioe.org>
On 2015-03-01 11:28, Dan Sorensen wrote:
> Good point but I wasn't intending to ask any tricky question. I think Ada 83
> code that hasn't been changed to use constructs or libraries from later
> versions still qualifies even if they recompile it with a later version for
> some reason and use it with newer code etc.
Then these may qualify :
<http://www.consafelogistics.com/our-offer/warehousing/sattstore-wms>
<http://www.consafelogistics.com/our-offer/warehousing/sattmate-wcs>
The core of it is seldom changed and most of that is still Ada83.
However new features often uses libraries/constructs from later version
of Ada.
The system are most likely considered small here.
We are not near 173_000 lines of code.
--
Björn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-01 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 9:36 Is Ada 83 still deployed anywhere? Dan Sorensen
2015-02-25 11:58 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2015-02-27 8:29 ` Björn Lundin
2015-03-01 10:28 ` Dan Sorensen
2015-03-01 12:10 ` Björn Lundin [this message]
2015-02-27 12:29 ` joakim.strandberg
2015-03-01 10:29 ` Dan Sorensen
2015-03-02 8:55 ` joakim.strandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox