From: "M. A. Alves" <maa@liacc.up.pt>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Subject: Re: Ada better language also for programming "in the small".
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:06:28 +0000 (GMT)
Date: 2001-07-11T10:06:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.994842431.16837.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba7nktcan0ojq3nvhqbic6u6ktvjm511r3@4ax.com>
> > Ada is a better language [than C, C++, Java, PERL] also for
> > programming "in the small".
>
> But this can also be said about Ocaml, Haskell, Lisp, Eiffel, Erlang,
> Scheme, etc ... And they do have the advantage of being more buzzword
> compliant :-)
Sure, if you are 'functional' enough ;-)
--
,
M A R I O data miner, LIACC, room 221 tel 351+226078830, ext 121
A M A D O Rua Campo Alegre, 823 fax 351+226003654
A L V E S P-4150 PORTO, Portugal mob 351+939354002
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-11 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-09 21:56 Death by analogy Part 1 (was RE: is Ada dead?) Michael P. Card
2001-07-09 23:29 ` Mário Amado Alves
2001-07-10 3:47 ` Michael P. Card
2001-07-11 0:27 ` Ada better language also for programming "in the small" raj
2001-07-11 10:06 ` M. A. Alves [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox