* re: Why is ada dead?
@ 2001-07-11 7:20 Gautier Write-only-address
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gautier Write-only-address @ 2001-07-11 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: comp.lang.ada
>The Ada community ( like the lisp comunity: yes I do know about Paul
>Graham's 49 million dollar sale to Yahoo ..) seem better at debating the
>benefits of the language than actually writing commercially visible
>software .
In general the debating community is better at debating than the
writing community...
G.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* is ada dead? @ 2001-07-05 21:56 tyler spivey 2001-07-06 19:12 ` Lao Xiao Hai 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: tyler spivey @ 2001-07-05 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw) is ada dead? is it only used in department of defense? is it easy/hard to learn? wil it die soon? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-05 21:56 tyler spivey @ 2001-07-06 19:12 ` Lao Xiao Hai 2001-07-07 1:57 ` Adrian Hoe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Lao Xiao Hai @ 2001-07-06 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw) tyler spivey wrote: > is ada dead? Yes. It seems no one lives forever. In the case of Ada, Countess of Lovelace, she died sometime around 1854. Richard Riehle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-06 19:12 ` Lao Xiao Hai @ 2001-07-07 1:57 ` Adrian Hoe 2001-07-07 18:33 ` James Rogers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Adrian Hoe @ 2001-07-07 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw) Lao Xiao Hai <laoxhai@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<3B460DA9.C2965042@ix.netcom.com>... > tyler spivey wrote: > > > is ada dead? > > Yes. It seems no one lives forever. In the case of Ada, > Countess of Lovelace, she died sometime around 1854. > > Richard Riehle Ada is dead in Malaysia. One of UTM's (University of Technology Malaysia) KL campus was teaching and promoting Ada with a lot of confidence couple years ago when they were a joint-venture with Thomson CSF. Recently, I found that they had deserted Ada and switch to Java for the reason that there is no Ada market in Malaysia. ANother reason came from one of the senior lecturer was that Ada was too old. I told the senior lecturer I could not believe what he was saying because they were so confident about Ada. So, is Ada dead in Malaysia? I don't know how many Malaysians have joint CLA, but I will say that Ada is not dead in Malaysia. Reason? UTM's main campus in JB is teaching Ada in general and real time programming and there are as many as 120 students right now, yes, today! Lexical Integration (M) Sdn Bhd, the company I work with, although not as agressive as 4-5 years ago, still promoting Ada. Our R&D division uses Ada for research projects. 100% of all works in Lexical are using Ada. Lexical Integration will emerge as Ada authority in Malaysia in no time to come and that's our ultimate goal! Ada is a programming language appreciated by engineers who know the benefits. Java is a programming language appreciated by people who likes to read ads and listen to marketing persuasion. I do not intend to flame Java. It is a language with its own benefits and strength. This is what actually happened in Malaysia. People likes to follow the newest trends. In universities (Malaysian, Ok?), programming languages are taught not because of teching the students of programming concepts, but for the sake of market requirement. That's the most pathetic and irresponsible decision. Adrian Just my 2 cents worth! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-07 1:57 ` Adrian Hoe @ 2001-07-07 18:33 ` James Rogers 2001-07-07 22:41 ` Andrzej Lewandowski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: James Rogers @ 2001-07-07 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) Adrian Hoe, It is good to hear from an Ada user in Malaysia. It is unfortunate that Malaysian Universities see themselves as sources of training for technology fads. The story you present below tells me that UTM is interested only in encouraging payments from students and industry. It has no real interest in making Malaysia a premier software education and development center. The education I can imagine from UTM can be described using an old phrase American immigrants used to describe the Platte River over 150 years ago: It is a mile wide and an inch deep. Another common description was "Too thick to drink and too thin to plow." The first saying indicates that the river is not nearly as impressive as it may first appear. The second saying indicates that it has no practical use. I am amazed that the senior lecturer was unchallenged in his or her statement about Ada being too old. I expect this is in comparison to Java. This amounts to saying that a proven product is not as good as an unproven product because the unproven product is newer. Such a statement is pure nonesense. It is even more nonesensical when you realize that Java has very few new language developments. It is simply a compilation of a lot of language features from a lot of other languages. In fact, without the standard Java API the language would be completely ignored. It offers nothing new, and it offers all these old features with very poor performance. I would have been tempted to ask the senior lecturer if he or she was willing to fly in an airplane with avionics programmed in Java. Look at Java's thread model. It is seriously flawed. This is not just my opinion. This is the opinion of the Java development team themselves. The earliest Java thread model included methods stop() and suspend(). After several years of use it was discovered that those methods are so unsafe that they had to be deprecated in the language. The use of each method would frequently result in deadlocks and race conditions. The major problem was not that those methods were faulty, but that the thread model was designed such that those methods could not be properly fixed. The only option left to the Java design team was to simply declare those methods to be broken, and advise against their use. Java tried one somewhat new idea for dealing with threads. That is the concept of thread groups. The idea was that threads could be associated with a group, allowing all the threads in a group to be stopped or suspended at the same time. Now that the stop() and suspend() methods are deprecated, there is no reason to use thread groups. Thus, the one attempt at real invention in the Java language was made redundant because the underlying thread model was so poorly designed. Java was originally touted as the answer to client-side programming in a networked environment using applets. Applets are java applications running in a user's browser. For several years people tried to make applets work. Some success was achieved. Then Java 2 was released, with its Java Foundation Classes including the Swing gui components. Swing is supposed to be usable with applets as well as regular applications. Unfortunately, Netscape and Internet Explorer have chosen to ignore Sun's advice on HTML support for Swing applets. Each has chosen its own approach to supporting Swing, resulting in a most horrible nightmare of HTML code to merely start a Swing applet. Even worse, there is no assurance that Netscape and Internet Explorer will not change their own HTML syntax to support Swing. The result is that Swing is essentially unusable in applets. Most companies simply use dynamically created HTML and CGI to perform client-side programming. Microsoft has created Application Server Pages for this purpose. Sun followed up with Java Server Pages. Applets are simply another feature of Java found to be of little practical use. Java is an unstandardized language. Sun likes to call this a de-facto standard. Sun has its own meaning for such a phrase. It means that everyone is encouraged to use Java. The Java API documentation is freely published on the web (even though the API documentation contains some serious errors). Sun is free to change the API documentation at any time. The thread example above is a good example. Sun maintains complete control over what Java is and is not. Sun has started into formal international standardization of Java no less than five times. Each time they have pulled out of the effort. It is not clear to me that Sun will ever cooperate with a standardization of Java. Java is clearly not superior to Ada. Java is not even clearly newer than Ada. Java is clearly more unstable and unsafe to use than Ada. Jim Rogers Colorado Springs, Colorado USA ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-07 18:33 ` James Rogers @ 2001-07-07 22:41 ` Andrzej Lewandowski 2001-07-08 10:52 ` Michal Nowak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrzej Lewandowski @ 2001-07-07 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw) "James Rogers" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3B475678.C582735D@worldnet.att.net... > Adrian Hoe, > > Java is clearly not superior to Ada. Java is not even clearly > newer than Ada. Java is clearly more unstable and unsafe to use > than Ada. > But almost everybody is using Java and almost non\body is using Ada. Who said this?... "garbage dumps are full of superior solutions". The process of adapting programming language has very little technical component, it is rather business and social process. A.L. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-07 22:41 ` Andrzej Lewandowski @ 2001-07-08 10:52 ` Michal Nowak 2001-07-08 22:38 ` Andrzej Lewandowski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Michal Nowak @ 2001-07-08 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: comp.lang.ada On 01-07-07, at 17:41, Andrzej Lewandowski wrote: >But almost everybody is using Java and almost non\body is using Ada. And who is using it? I don't. Maybe except applets on www pages. And you think it is good? Java was intended to be more OO-language than C++, to help desingning good software. It is step forward in some parts, but I think it can cause bad habits. Many my friends write in Java - they turned into "Java-people". But only little percent of them writes good code. In many cases Java code bacame more messy than C++ code. ??? Yes, garbage collector made them lazy. "I put it here or there, never mind, garbage collector will do its job". They gaining bad habits. Java can be one-way ticket. Switching back to other languages can be difficult (I observed this on labs - many of them had big problems in learning Ada and trobles in understaning it.) -Mike ------------------------ Mike Nowak mailto: vinnie@inetia.pl ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-08 10:52 ` Michal Nowak @ 2001-07-08 22:38 ` Andrzej Lewandowski 2001-07-09 1:20 ` James Rogers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrzej Lewandowski @ 2001-07-08 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw) "Michal Nowak" <vinnie@inetia.pl> wrote in message news:mailman.994589417.11908.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org... > On 01-07-07, at 17:41, Andrzej Lewandowski wrote: > > >But almost everybody is using Java and almost non\body is using Ada. > > And who is using it? I don't. Your problem, your choice. > Maybe except applets on www pages. > And you think it is good? Java was intended to be more OO-language than > C++, to help desingning good software. It is step forward in some parts, > but I think it can cause bad habits. Many my friends write in Java - they > turned into "Java-people". But only little percent of them writes good > code. In many cases Java code bacame more messy than C++ code. ??? > Yes, garbage collector made them lazy. "I put it here or there, never > mind, garbage collector will do its job". They gaining bad habits. Java > can be one-way ticket. Switching back to other languages can be difficult > (I observed this on labs - many of them had big problems in learning Ada > and trobles in understaning it.) I was thinking the same way when I was in the Academia. Now I am working for industry. My company has good programmers, good designers and they are writing good Java code. All these are not oxymorons. Good programmer will write good program in any language, bad programmer will write bad program in any language. have you ever seem C program written in Ada? You can find some excellent examples in some book published long ago by Springer. By the way, we have commercial system for logistics management that sells pretty well. It is all in Java, over 300 KLOC. Yes, Java has its problems, threading model is one of them. I made an attempt to use Ada (JGNAT strictly speaking) to write selected modules. Unfortunately, the cost of support was prohibitive. I am ready to pay for support, but the cost must be in sync with the rest of industry. Java threading model can be easily fixed. I am using CSP model, strictly speaking JCSP implementation from the University of Kent. Great! Switching to new language is business decision. Such transition costs a lot and must be carefully justified. I really cannot find arguments to switch to Ada. For what?... No programmers, tools in 6 digit range, vendors with unknown financial future. Moreover, except of programmers we have QA specialists, implementation services, maintenance service, etc. All these people should know the language to some extent. How it would cost to replace 50 people? Or to retrain them? And for what? To have "better" language? A.L> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-08 22:38 ` Andrzej Lewandowski @ 2001-07-09 1:20 ` James Rogers 2001-07-09 14:45 ` Marin David Condic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: James Rogers @ 2001-07-09 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Andrzej Lewandowski wrote: > > Switching to new language is business decision. Such transition costs a lot and must be > carefully justified. I really cannot find arguments to switch to Ada. For what?... No > programmers, tools in 6 digit range, vendors with unknown financial > future. Moreover, except of programmers we have QA specialists, implementation services, > maintenance service, etc. All these people should know the language to some extent. How it > would cost to replace 50 people? Or to retrain them? And for what? To have "better" > language? > This is all true. At some point someone decided to take the risk to switch to Java. That decision must have incurred all the financial and technical risks detailed above. Why was that risk justified when switching to Ada is not? Jim Rogers Colorado Springs, Colorado USA ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-09 1:20 ` James Rogers @ 2001-07-09 14:45 ` Marin David Condic 2001-07-09 15:54 ` Ted Dennison 2001-07-10 23:56 ` raj 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Marin David Condic @ 2001-07-09 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) That's rather presuming that all business decisions are made on some sort of rational basis. Figure that languages develop constituencies - Java got a stron constituency from a lot of C/C++ programmers who found it to have advantages, but wasn't too far from what they were used to. They had some help from the marketing guys who sold them on how "cool" it was. The poor sap who manages the organization has grown far from being able to keep up with technical innovations, etc., and has to trust his staff to tell him what is the "right" decision WRT languages. His techno-dweebs say "Java is the hip thing!" and he's got to believe them, so migration is made that way. IMHO, if we want to sell Ada, it has to be from that grass-roots level. Get the programers in the trenches using it in some capacity and deciding that they like it & it will start to percolate up to the "business decision" level. Key to that is having the kinds of development tools that are found for C++, Java, et alia. If a development kit was bundled up and put on bookshelves in Frye's or CompUSA, etc. that might go a long way to increasing awareness in the right crowd. MDC -- Marin David Condic Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com Enabling the digital revolution e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com Web: http://www.mcondic.com/ "James Rogers" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3B490751.38523577@worldnet.att.net... > > > This is all true. At some point someone decided to take the risk to > switch to Java. That decision must have incurred all the financial > and technical risks detailed above. Why was that risk justified when > switching to Ada is not? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is ada dead? 2001-07-09 14:45 ` Marin David Condic @ 2001-07-09 15:54 ` Ted Dennison 2001-07-10 23:59 ` Why " raj 2001-07-10 23:56 ` raj 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2001-07-09 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <9icg1p$kpi$1@nh.pace.co.uk>, Marin David Condic says... >what is the "right" decision WRT languages. His techno-dweebs say "Java is >the hip thing!" and he's got to believe them, so migration is made that way. > >IMHO, if we want to sell Ada, it has to be from that grass-roots level. Get I see two possible ways to increase Ada's "hipness". One would be a massive marketing campaign, like Sun did for Java. I don't think anyone in the Ada community has that kind of dough to throw around. The other is to start developing lots of "cool" stuff with it. *That*, I think we can do. Right now the best example of this that I know of is GVD (http://libre.act-europe.fr/gvd/ ), but perhaps I'm a werido for thinking debuggers are cool. :-) --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* re: Why is ada dead? 2001-07-09 15:54 ` Ted Dennison @ 2001-07-10 23:59 ` raj 2001-07-14 16:53 ` Stefan Skoglund 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: raj @ 2001-07-10 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw) On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 15:54:57 GMT, Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> wrote: >The other is to start developing lots of "cool" stuff with it. *That*, I think >we can do. Right now the best example of this that I know of is GVD >(http://libre.act-europe.fr/gvd/ ), but perhaps I'm a werido for thinking >debuggers are cool. :-) The Ada community ( like the lisp comunity: yes I do know about Paul Graham's 49 million dollar sale to Yahoo ..) seem better at debating the benefits of the language than actually writing commercially visible software . ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is ada dead? 2001-07-10 23:59 ` Why " raj @ 2001-07-14 16:53 ` Stefan Skoglund 2001-07-14 23:14 ` James Rogers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stefan Skoglund @ 2001-07-14 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) raj wrote: > The Ada community ( like the lisp comunity: yes I do know about Paul > Graham's 49 million dollar sale to Yahoo ..) seem better at debating > the benefits of the language than actually writing commercially > visible software . The Ada system houses should really do the Ada Airlines PR gimmick !! They should also do the Ada railway gimmick to... hmm, not good railways is seen by americans as being obsolete... hmm, no american would probably believe what the SNCF did a few days ago... (a special run between Calais and Marseille) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is ada dead? 2001-07-14 16:53 ` Stefan Skoglund @ 2001-07-14 23:14 ` James Rogers 2001-07-15 22:57 ` Stefan Skoglund 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: James Rogers @ 2001-07-14 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw) Stefan Skoglund wrote: > > raj wrote: > > The Ada community ( like the lisp comunity: yes I do know about Paul > > Graham's 49 million dollar sale to Yahoo ..) seem better at debating > > the benefits of the language than actually writing commercially > > visible software . > > The Ada system houses should really do the Ada Airlines PR > gimmick !! > > They should also do the Ada railway gimmick to... > hmm, not good railways is seen by americans as being obsolete... > hmm, no american would probably believe what the SNCF did > a few days ago... (a special run between Calais and Marseille) Oh, you mean the trip did not take three days, with frequent stops to allow freight the right of way, and to allow maintenance crews to repair 100 year old rails? Nope. No American would believe that. American railroads currently carry more traffic than ever before in their history. The plain truth, however, is that only a tiny fraction of that traffic is passenger. Almost all is freight. Here in Colorado Springs, the rails are busy day and night with freight traffic. The largest fraction of that is trains carrying coal. Every day there are several trains of over two kilometers length carrying nothing but coal from the coal mines of Wyoming and Idaho. Of course, we do have one little passenger train in our area. That would be the train that travels to the top of Pike's Peak. The equipment for that train was purchased from Switzerland a long time ago. The track is steep enough to require a cog rail system. The train route rises 8000 feet (2.4 Km) in about 12 miles (19.3 km) to a final altitude of 14110 feet (4.3 Km). This is far too steep for normal trains. Some of that coal stops in Colorado Springs. We generate our electricity from burning coal. We also provide all the power our city needs from local power plants. We do this with negligable air polution. Recently the American Lung Association declared that Colorado Springs has the third cleanest air of all American cities. As an example, on an average day I can clearly see mountains over 70 miles away. That is not bad for average air quality. On a good day I can see mountains over 200 miles away. Today I can only see about 70 miles, but we are currently having thunderstorms. I will be surprised if the US ever develops a train that can compete with the French TGV. In the West the population is too sparse to support the cost. In the East the cost of acquiring the right of way would be too expensive. Current rail lines could not be converted because they contain too many sharp turns to support high speed rail travel. Jim Rogers Colorado Springs, Colorado USA ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is ada dead? 2001-07-14 23:14 ` James Rogers @ 2001-07-15 22:57 ` Stefan Skoglund 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Stefan Skoglund @ 2001-07-15 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw) James Rogers wrote: > I will be surprised if the US ever develops a train that can > compete with the French TGV. In the West the population is too > sparse to support the cost. In the East the cost of acquiring the > right of way would be too expensive. Current rail lines could not > be converted because they contain too many sharp turns to support > high speed rail travel. Ok i will numerate the areas of the US which i think has potential: Illinois (Chicago-St Louis, Chicago-Mpls, Chicago-Detroit) Washingto-Boston (fixing a number of nasty curves along the corridor) NorthWest (portland-vancouver) Florida California The Acela train could be competitive in the East and also California. And then we have the tilting TGV version. The North-East corridor can be improved by eliminating a number of nasty curves but it would mean investing maybe 1 bn dollar while fighting the nimby's. The problem is getting people onboard in sufficient numbers and also US citites is usually much more decentralized than european ones and they also usually has a much worser commuting system (LA is prob the worst one) Chicago is bad too due to the rapid expansion west into Illinois farmlands. Colorado could be interesting too. Col Springs-Denver A worse problem is US railways disbelief in electrification but they have part-good reasons to dislike it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Why is ada dead? 2001-07-09 14:45 ` Marin David Condic 2001-07-09 15:54 ` Ted Dennison @ 2001-07-10 23:56 ` raj 2001-07-11 2:59 ` James Rogers 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: raj @ 2001-07-10 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw) On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:45:12 -0400, "Marin David Condic" <marin.condic.auntie.spam@pacemicro.com> wrote: >That's rather presuming that all business decisions are made on some sort of >rational basis. Figure that languages develop constituencies - Java got a >stron constituency from a lot of C/C++ programmers who found it to have >advantages, but wasn't too far from what they were used to. They had some >help from the marketing guys who sold them on how "cool" it was. The poor >sap who manages the organization has grown far from being able to keep up >with technical innovations, etc., and has to trust his staff to tell him >what is the "right" decision WRT languages. His techno-dweebs say "Java is >the hip thing!" and he's got to believe them, so migration is made that way. I am now hearing of increasing numbers of programmers who will only take on jobs if they involve Java and JSP ! Their rationale is that they do not want to lose their skill set by working in languages that are not commercially hot. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is ada dead? 2001-07-10 23:56 ` raj @ 2001-07-11 2:59 ` James Rogers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: James Rogers @ 2001-07-11 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw) raj wrote: > > I am now hearing of increasing numbers of programmers who will only > take on jobs if they involve Java and JSP ! > Their rationale is that they do not want to lose their skill set by > working in languages that are not commercially hot. Where will those programmers be when the next hot technology comes along? What is wrong with the money available from languages that are not at the top of the technology fad list? People who react to any kind of fad like this are riding the tip of the whip. They are completely at the mercy of the decisions of other unthinking people. They feel safe because they are surrounded by lots of other lemmings. That does not actually make them safe when the lemming heard starts hurtling over the cliff. I have always believed I was responsible for my own career. I am also responsible for finding work that satisfies me. I cannot achieve any level of control over my work if I do not actively choose the kind of work I do, and the tools I use. The mindset eager to follow fads is, IMHO, an indication of a very insecure personality. Fad followers are continually looking for the affirmation of others to improve their own self image. The continuing search for the next fad is chaotic. It engenders psychotic reactions against reason, stabiity, and even custom. In summary, it is a strong force against civilization and culture. It is an attempt to find security in the ephemeral, stability in chaos, and satisfaction in mindless action. Jim Rogers Colorado Springs, Colorado USA ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-15 22:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-07-11 7:20 Why is ada dead? Gautier Write-only-address -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2001-07-05 21:56 tyler spivey 2001-07-06 19:12 ` Lao Xiao Hai 2001-07-07 1:57 ` Adrian Hoe 2001-07-07 18:33 ` James Rogers 2001-07-07 22:41 ` Andrzej Lewandowski 2001-07-08 10:52 ` Michal Nowak 2001-07-08 22:38 ` Andrzej Lewandowski 2001-07-09 1:20 ` James Rogers 2001-07-09 14:45 ` Marin David Condic 2001-07-09 15:54 ` Ted Dennison 2001-07-10 23:59 ` Why " raj 2001-07-14 16:53 ` Stefan Skoglund 2001-07-14 23:14 ` James Rogers 2001-07-15 22:57 ` Stefan Skoglund 2001-07-10 23:56 ` raj 2001-07-11 2:59 ` James Rogers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox