From: ANH_VO@udlp.com
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Subject: Re[2]: Storage Pool
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:22:07 -0500
Date: 2001-06-13T16:22:07-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.992475201.8456.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
Bob,
Could you elaborate more on your NO answer? I do not have enough evidence to say
either way. However, based on test results from GNAT 3.13p, the answer is yes. I
need to conduct further test using APEX and ObjectAda. If it works as GNAT, I
will post the codes.
A. Vo
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: Re: Storage Pool
Author: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Date: 6/13/01 10:55 PM
ANH_VO@udlp.com writes:
> Is it correct to assume that Size_In_Storage_Element mod Alignment = 0 for
both
> subprograms Allocate and Deallocate for any type derived from
Root_Storage_Pool
> as shown below
No. But you can write a storage pool that requires that, and only use
it for types that obey that rule.
I have written storage pools that assume Alignment = 4 (and
pragma-assert so).
- Bob
_______________________________________________
next reply other threads:[~2001-06-13 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-13 21:22 ANH_VO [this message]
2001-06-14 14:57 ` Re[2]: Storage Pool Robert A Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-15 11:28 ANH_VO
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox