From: "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <rleif@rleif.com>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Subject: RE: Ada for Windows CE
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:41:55 -0800
Date: 2001-02-16T21:41:55-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.982388594.17123.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A8DF1F4.7CC362A1@erols.com>
From: Bob Leif
To: William Whitaker et al.
Is a native code compiler required for these applications or will a J code
compiler be sufficient?
One of the best characteristics of XML is that it is closer to Ada than to
any of the C tribe of languages. I still believe that we need XML_Io and a
means to create XML data types from Ada specifications and the data types in
Ada specifications from XML schemas [or whatever is the correct plural for
schema].
-----Original Message-----
From: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
[mailto:comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org]On Behalf Of William A Whitaker
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 7:37 PM
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Subject: Ada for Windows CE
In the book "XML by example" there is the claim (by W3C?) that by 2002
75% of surfing will be on handhelds. True or not, there is a lot of
that going around. Regularly iget requests for my LAtin dictionary for
handheld Windows CE, or even the DOS-like partitions on handhelds.
I hereby make my yearly search/request for Ada compilers targeted to
these systems. They are becoming more prevalent.
Whitaker
I support Shakespeare and Latin!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-17 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-17 3:37 Ada for Windows CE William A Whitaker
2001-02-17 5:41 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. [this message]
2001-02-23 2:37 ` William J. Thomas
2001-02-23 3:40 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2001-02-23 5:18 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-23 8:52 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox