comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: RE: Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:51:08 +0100
Date: 2003-12-11T16:51:08+01:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.93.1071157915.31149.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)



| -----Message d'origine-----
| De: Marin David Condic [mailto:nobody@noplace.com]
| This is especially 
| true where I might need to keep code portable between two different 
| compilers. Also its a big problem when what needs to be 
| different is in 
| the *specification* of something. (Yes, I know, "One more layer of 
| indirection...." can go fix it - but why should it be so hard?)

The whole point is what is harder, pre-processing or redesign?
I don't think there is a unique generic answer, but I observe that
pre-processing is often choosen because it's easier to settle down in the
*short term* than some redesign.  

-- 
Lionel Draghi



             reply	other threads:[~2003-12-11 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-11 15:51 Lionel.DRAGHI [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-11 12:52 Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-12-10 20:04 Greg Milford
2003-12-10 21:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-12-10 22:29 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-12-12  5:52   ` Simon Wright
2003-12-11  1:07 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-12-11 13:34   ` Marin David Condic
2003-12-11 17:49     ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-12-11  5:39 ` Steve
2003-12-11 16:59 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox