From: Preben Randhol <randhol+cla2@pvv.org>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Poll: Qt4Ada as alternative to GtkAda
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:34:57 +0200
Date: 2006-07-28T12:35:29+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.8.1154082903.32700.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eacom1$isa$1@online.de>
michael bode <michael.bode@laserline.de> wrote on 28/07/2006 (12:30) :
> But I think this is quite clear: gnat from FSF still has the linking
> exception. GCC-GNAT 4.1 is available for some Linux distributions
> (MacOS X?) and I think MinGW gnat 3.4.5 is available for Windows.
So it means that what ACT contributes to FSF (gcc) is GMGPL, while what
they package themselves is GPL?
I'm really getting confused about the license mess now... What is the
license in Debian for gnat-4.1 ?
Preben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-28 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-27 23:08 Poll: Qt4Ada as alternative to GtkAda Yves Bailly
2006-07-28 7:02 ` vgodunko
2006-07-28 7:36 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-28 10:09 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-28 10:24 ` michael bode
2006-07-28 10:34 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2006-07-28 13:17 ` Simon Clubley
2006-07-28 14:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-28 15:56 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-07-28 17:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-29 19:10 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-30 14:53 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-28 16:45 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox