* [Fwd: Re: SourceForge vs Savannah]
@ 2003-10-10 18:17 Marius Amado Alves
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Marius Amado Alves @ 2003-10-10 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: comp.lang.ada
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 68 bytes --]
(Stephen sorry I sent this only to you before--reply button habit.)
[-- Attachment #2: Forwarded message - Re: SourceForge vs Savannah --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1247 bytes --]
From: Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
To: Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: SourceForge vs Savannah
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:13:01 +0000
Message-ID: <1065809580.2787.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 14:41, Stephen Leake wrote:
> chris <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> writes:
> > I would be willing to submit some of my work provided I got the
> > ability to work on it and extend it. I would even be willing to hand
> > over my copyright, again providing I got the ability to play with it
> > (also some credit) and it was some kind of group.
> That's what licensing is all about. The GPL, or the GMGPL, gives you
> what you are asking for.
Hardly. GPL has been shown to limit the business model to either dual
licensing--which is ugly, of doubtful legality, and unpractical with
respect to contributions from the outside--, or selling support--which
has nothing to do with authorship credit. This is why I suggested
www.softdevelcoop.org before. See the paper "Open Source Business Found
Parasitic" there.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-10-10 18:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-10 18:17 [Fwd: Re: SourceForge vs Savannah] Marius Amado Alves
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox