From: "Marius Amado Alves" <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Subject: Re: Yet another XML and Ada issue
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:11:36 -0700
Date: 2004-04-26T01:11:36-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.6.1082934813.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 657ea3e3.0404251320.7a725c41@posting.google.com
> What would happen if I suggested to this news group that Ada be
> replaced by "a more compact notation" "useful for writing programs
> when the use of ASIS and other tools are "not required."?
Ocasionally I do generate Ada from specialised notations.
But we're not really disagreeing here. I understand the importance of giving
ecumenical status to some standard, be it XSchema.
What is "FAKE ADA"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-26 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-25 10:02 Yet another XML and Ada issue Marius Amado Alves
2004-04-25 16:31 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-04-25 21:20 ` Robert C. Leif
2004-04-26 8:11 ` Marius Amado Alves [this message]
2004-04-26 15:44 ` chris
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox