From: Marius Amado Alves <maa@liacc.up.pt>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: library level required or not?
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:21:46 +0000
Date: 2004-03-01T19:21:46+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.50.1078168232.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrnc470vd.a04.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
On Monday 01 March 2004 18:41, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On 2004-03-01, Marius Amado Alves <maa@liacc.up.pt> wrote:
> > Ok, I found Ada Issue 115, which clarifies that "a language-defined
> > generic package may be instantiated at any nesting depth."
> >
> > I'm still in the dark regarding unbounded strings though, as
> > Ada.Strings.Unbounded is not generic.
>
> What do you mean?
If you look at the GNAT sources for example, you'll find that Unbounded_String
is controlled. And yet you can declare an unbounded string inside a 'main'
program. Try pulling that out with your own controlled type.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-01 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200403011717.22528.maa@liacc.up.pt>
2004-03-01 18:49 ` library level required or not? Marius Amado Alves
2004-03-01 18:41 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-01 19:21 ` Marius Amado Alves [this message]
2004-03-01 20:17 ` Simon Wright
2004-03-01 23:32 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-03-02 2:36 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-03-01 17:17 Marius Amado Alves
2004-03-01 23:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-03-02 0:21 ` Marius Amado Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox