From: "Beard, Frank Randolph CIV" <frank.beard@navy.mil>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Subject: RE: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bitaddressing and OOP
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:05:39 -0400
Date: 2003-04-29T12:05:39-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.5.1051632438.9816.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
Has anybody else seen this article that is of relevance here?
http://www.acm.org/technews/articles/2003-5/0428m.html#item2
I'd be interested in softeng3456's (nice cryptic non-software
engineering name) opinion here, since it some what opposes his
ideas.
I'm not sure he will see this if it's only posted on comp.lang.ada.
Frank
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-29 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-29 16:05 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-25 18:15 the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bitaddressing and OOP Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-04-25 18:10 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-04-25 17:59 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-04-26 3:53 ` Wesley Groleau
2003-04-25 17:21 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-04-23 13:19 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox