From: Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>
To: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>,
comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 Ada compiler quality?
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:44:44 +0200
Date: 2004-04-22T14:44:44+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.49.1082637900.314.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c68bv9$qcu$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
On Thursday 22 April 2004 13:57, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> Brian Catlin <BrianC@sannas.org.bad> wrote:
> : I know it was just released, but does anyone have a good feel for the
> : quality of the new GCC 3.4 Ada compiler? Is it worth upgrading from
> : 3.15P, or should I wait until 3.5?
>
> It has solved some problems for me having to do with private
> children, and with generic formals in certain circumstances.
>
> I find -gnatwa quite useful
>
> The project file support is better (though this might affect
> portabiliy).
I have had problems with the code generated when using -gnatn,
and sometimes when just using -O2 (mysterious segmentation
faults, exception handling failing etc). I haven't noticed any regressions
when compiling without optimisation, compared to gnat 3.15p.
All the best,
Duncan.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-22 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-21 18:15 GCC 3.4 Ada compiler quality? Brian Catlin
2004-04-21 18:52 ` Adrian Knoth
2004-04-22 11:57 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-04-22 12:44 ` Duncan Sands [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox