From: Marius Amado Alves <maa@liacc.up.pt>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: library level required or not?
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:17:22 +0000
Date: 2004-03-01T17:17:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.48.1078160769.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
Language lawers, please help me.
I have in my notes that an object, of a type declared in package Ada or
descendants, is not required to be defined at library level, even if the type
is controlled. (I know I can declare unbounded strings, which are clearly
controlled, in a 'main' procedure.)
I vaguely recall deriving this rule from the RM, but now I cannot find the
clause. Is the rule true? By what clause?
Thanks a lot.
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-01 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-01 17:17 Marius Amado Alves [this message]
2004-03-01 23:37 ` library level required or not? Randy Brukardt
2004-03-02 0:21 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-03-02 2:31 ` Main subprogram at library level (was: library level required or not?) Jeffrey Carter
2004-03-02 22:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-03-03 1:21 ` Main subprogram at library level Jeffrey Carter
2004-03-03 7:54 ` Dale Stanbrough
2004-03-03 18:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-03-04 0:37 ` Jeffrey Carter
[not found] <200403011717.22528.maa@liacc.up.pt>
2004-03-01 18:49 ` library level required or not? Marius Amado Alves
2004-03-01 18:41 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-01 19:21 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-03-01 20:17 ` Simon Wright
2004-03-01 23:32 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-03-02 2:36 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox