From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Binding and linking non-withed packages into an executable
Date: 27 Jan 2004 18:25:32 -0500
Date: 2004-01-27T18:25:32-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.43.1075245947.2270.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bv6n5n$oai2g$1@ID-218515.news.uni-berlin.de>
"Marc A. Criley" <mcNOSPAM@mckae.com> writes:
> Obviously I can have a "configuration package" that with's the "peripheral"
> packages and is withed by the main, but I'd like to make the inclusion of
> such packages a build, rather than compile, issue. This way new callback
> packages can be brought in or omitted as needed (the actual app is of course
> more sophisticated than the above toy), so no actual software would have to
> change.
I define "actual software" as "anything in CVS". In your desired
system, the Makefile would have to change. In standard Ada, one .adb
file would have to change. Either way, it's one file in CVS.
What is the actual gain over doing it in a non-standard way?
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-27 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-27 21:56 Binding and linking non-withed packages into an executable Marc A. Criley
2004-01-27 23:25 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2004-01-28 0:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-01-28 2:55 ` Stephen Leake
2004-01-28 0:44 ` Robert A Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-05 18:53 Lionel.DRAGHI
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox