comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Björn Lundin" <bnl@spray.se>
To: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Cc: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: XMLAda dom document to string
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:35:41 +0200
Date: 2005-04-14T17:35:41+02:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.36.1113492956.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425E1B1A.7020102@mailinator.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1342 bytes --]


2005-04-14 kl. 09.26 skrev Alex R. Mosteo:
>
> About the license, it may be indeed that it must be GMGPL because
> XML/Ada is. I copied/pasted the license block in the rest of my 
> original
> code, but here we're talking about a modification of XML/Ada so I
> presume I must maintain the original license (which I'm not interested
> in modifying, I simply didn't thought of it until now).
>
> I presume that any modification introduced in the GPL such as the GMGPL
> is propagated? I mean, Could someone provide a more restrictive license
> for a derivative work?
>
> In any case I will reflect this change in the file license ASAP.

I looked at your cvs-site, but did not find it.
However, I then presume it is ok if I paste in the GMGPL into
Dom.Core.Nodes.Output ?

>>> but be warned that it performs some pretty printing and by that
>>> reason  Windows-style new lines are embedded in the resulting
>>> string.
>> I can live with that.
>
> There are too some chunks of whitespace for tabulating. That can add
> quite some size. You may want to remove that too if the XML generated 
> is
> never for human consumption.
>
Well, it's not intended for humans, but it's fairly small documents 
(less than 5 k)
so i'll keep it ,since it makes it easier to debug

/Björn

Björn Lundin
bnl at spray dot se

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/enriched, Size: 1443 bytes --]



2005-04-14 kl. 09.26 skrev Alex R. Mosteo:

<excerpt>

About the license, it may be indeed that it must be GMGPL because

XML/Ada is. I copied/pasted the license block in the rest of my
original

code, but here we're talking about a modification of XML/Ada so I

presume I must maintain the original license (which I'm not interested

in modifying, I simply didn't thought of it until now).


I presume that any modification introduced in the GPL such as the GMGPL

is propagated? I mean, Could someone provide a more restrictive license

for a derivative work?


In any case I will reflect this change in the file license ASAP.

</excerpt>

I looked at your cvs-site, but did not find it.

However, I then presume it is ok if I paste in the GMGPL into 

<fixed>Dom.Core.Nodes.Output ? </fixed>


<excerpt><excerpt><excerpt>but be warned that it performs some pretty
printing and by that

reason  Windows-style new lines are embedded in the resulting

string.

</excerpt>I can live with that.

</excerpt>

There are too some chunks of whitespace for tabulating. That can add

quite some size. You may want to remove that too if the XML generated
is

never for human consumption.


</excerpt>Well, it's not intended for humans, but it's fairly small
documents (less than 5 k)

so i'll keep it ,since it makes it easier to debug


/Björn


Björn Lundin

bnl at spray dot se


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-14 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-13  6:14 XMLAda dom document to string Björn Lundin
2005-04-13  7:03 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2005-04-13 17:03   ` Björn Lundin
2005-04-14  7:26     ` Alex R. Mosteo
2005-04-14 15:35       ` Björn Lundin [this message]
2005-04-15  9:32         ` Alex R. Mosteo
2005-04-13 18:50   ` Björn Lundin
2005-04-13  7:37 ` Martin Dowie
2005-04-13 17:08   ` Björn Lundin
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox