From: christoph.grein@eurocopter.com
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Subject: Re: Procedure Overloading
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:57:25 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: 2003-07-25T07:57:25+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.36.1059113327.24167.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
Why on earth have the creators of the Ada GLU binding chosen to shoot themselves
into the foot?
I do not see a way to resolve the overloading ambiguity (except of course
changing the declarations :-(.
There are other ways to produce unresolvable ambiguities, e.g.
generic
type T is private;
package G is
procedure P (X: T);
procedure P (X: Boolean);
end G;
with G;
package I is new G (Boolean); -- legal, but I.P is unresovably ambiguous.
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-25 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-25 5:57 christoph.grein [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-24 20:49 Procedure Overloading Justin Schaub
2003-07-25 7:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox