Re: A bug in gnat/gcc 3.3.3?

[Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>]

Hi Ludovic,

> I differ with this.  The quality of GCC 3.4 is similar to, but not
> significantly better than that of GNAT 3.15p.  Also, 3.4 is much
> slower and memory-hungry than 3.15p (it may or may not matter to you
> but it's a fact). More importantly, GCC 3.4 does not have ASIS or
> GLADE.  Until this changes, I still think that GNAT 3.15p is the best
> choice as the foundation of a complete Ada development and runtime
> environment.  It is important to use only one version of GNAT, because
> this makes it possible to distribute programs and shared libraries
> that are binary-compatible with each other.  The lack of ASIS and
> GLADE for GCC 3.4 restricts the set of packages that can be made in
> this way.

gcc at the pre-ssa CVS tag is pretty good.

Ciao,

Duncan.