From: "Anh Vo" <Anh.Vo@baesystems.com>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Subject: Re: Tasking, protected objects, Ada 95 RM
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:38:23 -0500
Date: 2006-07-18T18:44:02+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.33.1153240751.30988.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
> >>> Ed Falis <falis@verizon.net> 7/18/2006 8:30:18 AM >>>
> Ed Falis wrote:
> > An accept statement is not a protected action in the technical
jargon
> > of
> > the RM. So calling connect from there is not potentially
blocking.
> Sorry, it is "potentially blocking" but not in a manner that is
> meaningful in the context of the quote you gave from the RM - it is
not
> a bounded error in this case.
Tasking is always my favorite interest. In fact, this is a cool,
advanced and complex stuff. Beside Ed's answer, I would suggest that
your codes be posted, if it is not proprietary. This makes the
discussion more precise and no misunderstanding :-)
AV
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-18 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-18 16:38 Anh Vo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-18 15:09 Tasking, protected objects, Ada 95 RM ldb
2006-07-18 15:22 ` Ed Falis
2006-07-18 15:30 ` Ed Falis
2006-07-18 19:15 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-18 21:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-07-19 14:00 ` ldb
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox