Re: Getting a symbol table from Gnat 3.15p on Windows

["David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marin David Condic" <mcondic.auntie.spam@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Sent: February 20, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Getting a symbol table from Gnat 3.15p on Windows


> David C. Hoos, Sr. <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.29.1045754029.9948.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org...
> > Have you tried the "secret handshake" given in Section 5.1 of the GNAT
> > User's Guide?
> >
> I try not to read documentation if I can get someone to do it for me. I'm in
> management now. :-) But thanks for pointing me at 5.1 - I'll take a glance
> and see if it answers the questions.
> 
> 
> > I don't see any problem if all you want to do is "interrogate."
> Attempting
> > to write, however, is another matter, as some of the app's memory is sure
> > to be "read only."
> >
> Nope. Gotta be able to write to addresses. Its a matter of being able to set
> up test cases that deposit data, cycle the code, collect results and return
> them to the other app. If I can't do this, its a non-starter. If the
> restriction is only on some "special" addresses, maybe we can live with
> that.
The restricted addresses would be the code space and read-only data -- e.g.,
constant data storage.  Variables would not be retstricted.
> 
> MDC
> --
> ======================================================================
> Marin David Condic
> I work for: http://www.belcan.com/
> My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/
> 
> Send Replies To: m c o n d i c @ a c m . o r g
> 
>     "Going cold turkey isn't as delicious as it sounds."
>         -- H. Simpson
> ======================================================================
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> comp.lang.ada mailing list
> comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada
> 
>