From: Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Problem With Self-Referential Access-to-Subprogram Type
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:55:16 +0000
Date: 2003-11-05T18:55:16+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.285.1068058551.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4682ab7.0311050949.59c4daf3@posting.google.com>
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 17:49, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> ... The feeling at the time was that
> the additional work needed to change the language and the compilers
> shouldn't be required if no one has run into the problem in practice.
> I've let them know that someone now has run into it.
Did you verify that the problem was "real"? The example does not seem to
show enough. Can be just an experimentation of the general construction,
with no specific application in mind. Some newbies do that. (In which
case the 2002 decision should probably stand. Private types solve the
general problem.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-05 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-03 16:58 Problem With Self-Referential Access-to-Subprogram Type Tad Ashlock
2003-11-04 10:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-04 13:52 ` Tad Ashlock
2003-11-04 14:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-04 14:52 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-11-05 8:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-05 11:27 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-11-05 13:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-05 14:02 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-11-05 17:49 ` Adam Beneschan
2003-11-05 18:55 ` Marius Amado Alves [this message]
2003-11-05 22:54 ` Tad Ashlock
2003-11-06 17:45 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-03 17:32 amado.alves
2003-11-04 14:02 ` Tad Ashlock
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox