From: Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Problem With Self-Referential Access-to-Subprogram Type
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 14:02:13 +0000
Date: 2003-11-05T14:02:13+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.281.1068040968.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j7shqvoaubg7jstuh4qak8t30p1qvrqvil@4ax.com>
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 13:33, Dmitry A.Kazakov wrote:
> ... Private types are much more prematurely usable! (:-))
Indeed. And they make *both* definitions possible. (I'm ashamed I did
not remembered this before, instead of access types.)
But the original question (for incomplete types) remains unanswered.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-05 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-03 16:58 Problem With Self-Referential Access-to-Subprogram Type Tad Ashlock
2003-11-04 10:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-04 13:52 ` Tad Ashlock
2003-11-04 14:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-04 14:52 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-11-05 8:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-05 11:27 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-11-05 13:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-05 14:02 ` Marius Amado Alves [this message]
2003-11-05 17:49 ` Adam Beneschan
2003-11-05 18:55 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-11-05 22:54 ` Tad Ashlock
2003-11-06 17:45 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-03 17:32 amado.alves
2003-11-04 14:02 ` Tad Ashlock
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox