* P.S. Feasibility of using Ada in new development
[not found] <20040903150038.B42974C4138@lovelace.ada-france.org>
@ 2004-09-03 18:10 ` Andrew Carroll
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Carroll @ 2004-09-03 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: comp.lang.ada
Hopefully my mention of "my" failure and ineptitude to use A# does not
deter others from using it. It has been revealed to me that a GUI can
be built using Visual Studio (C#) and then references to Ada Dll's can
be placed into the C# code so that Ada can be used for the "real work".
Impressive! I can't say that I would have ever thought of doing that.
Then again, I'm not sure I'd want to?. Hmmm...was that in the docs?
Anyway, I've never used Visual Studio .Net and I think the person who
revealed it to me was in fact the author (or one of them) of A#. I'm
pretty sure they have a better understanding of it that I.
My point was that A. you can choose what you and the client "feel good
about", B. The project may dictate what you choose and C. Due to
popularity, hype, productivity and available documentation there may not
be much of a choice.
Andrew Carroll
Carroll-Tech
720-273-6814
andrew@carroll-tech.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-09-03 18:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20040903150038.B42974C4138@lovelace.ada-france.org>
2004-09-03 18:10 ` P.S. Feasibility of using Ada in new development Andrew Carroll
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox