Re: Licensing, again

["Carroll, Andrew" <andrew.carroll@okstate.edu>]

------------------------------
From: M E Leypold
	<development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>
Subject: Re: Licensing, again

> Well, that is your problem then, man. (Shaking my head). You obviously
> don't want an answer. Let me tell you: The Debian policy documents for
> choosing the compilers now and in future are exemplary (at least
> compared with the usual non documentation of open source stuff goes
> :-)). 
>
> And don't expect people to "explain" something to you if you're to
> conceited to read some text elsewhere which explains what you want to
> know. After all under these circumstance one wouldn't expect you to
> read the explanation written in c.l.a, or would you?
>
> Regards -- Markus
------------------------------

So you're going to try and butt in and make it your problem because
you're the ultimate authority on all matters and subjects; especially
what Ludovic thinks and what I want.  Talk about conceited.  

After all, YOU would expect me to read the explanation in c.l.a. but I
do not revolve around what YOU want.  Not to mention that the wiki-link
was not presented as a FAQ link before I asked the question nor was it
presented as an FAQ in the response to my question.  For that matter
Ludovic wasn't even the person to say that the wiki IS the FAQ.

Andrew