From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Interoperability: differing storage units and/or endianess
Date: 20 Feb 2004 03:56:08 -0500
Date: 2004-02-20T03:56:08-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.2.1077267380.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c14dmn$qd3$1@online.de>
Michael Paus <pausnospam@nospamib-paus.com> writes:
> Bibb Latting wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am working on a distributed application where the processors
> > have differing storage unit sizes and/or endianess. My problem is how
> > to handle the specification of memory contents and the delivery of
> > data to applications with minimal variation between implementations.
> > I'd like to know what solutions have worked well for others.
>
> And I'd like to know which currently used processors have a storage
> unit size other than 8.
Many DSPs use 16 bit words.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-20 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 12:29 Interoperability: differing storage units and/or endianess Bibb Latting
2004-02-19 17:23 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-02-20 13:52 ` Martin Dowie
2004-02-20 7:41 ` Michael Paus
2004-02-20 8:56 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2004-02-20 10:54 ` Michael Paus
2004-02-20 13:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-02-20 12:43 ` Petter Fryklund
2004-02-20 20:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-02-21 5:34 ` Steve
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox